Trump Started a War With Iran and Got the Obama Iran Deal, But $300 Billion Bigger | The Warrant Trick: Know What ICE Is Really Holding | INTRODUCING GASOLINE PLUS™ | Household Voting Is Patriarchy in a Floral Dress | Another "Alpha" Doing Beta Sh*t | Ted Cruz and the Soft Hands of Performative Manhood | This was leaked by the White House | Kushner's Exclusive Island Has No Connection to Epstein or Does It? | Confidence isn't loud. It's steady. F*ck Trump's Childishness | The Greatest Magic Trick in American Politics | No Blue Falcons, No Free Passes | The Pentagon Is Not a Make-A-Wish Foundation for Insurrectionists | Trump Started a War With Iran and Got the Obama Iran Deal, But $300 Billion Bigger | The Warrant Trick: Know What ICE Is Really Holding | INTRODUCING GASOLINE PLUS™ | Household Voting Is Patriarchy in a Floral Dress | Another "Alpha" Doing Beta Sh*t | Ted Cruz and the Soft Hands of Performative Manhood | This was leaked by the White House | Kushner's Exclusive Island Has No Connection to Epstein or Does It? | Confidence isn't loud. It's steady. F*ck Trump's Childishness | The Greatest Magic Trick in American Politics | No Blue Falcons, No Free Passes | The Pentagon Is Not a Make-A-Wish Foundation for Insurrectionists |
Whiskey Leaks — Operational Edition
Whiskey Leaks

Resist fascism and authoritarian rule.

Est. in the ruins of accountability Unclassified // For Immediate Mockery

“Those Who Don’t Remember the Past…”: Echoes of Stalin’s Purges in Trump’s National Security Firings

On May 23, more than 100 NSC officials were placed on administrative leave with barely any notice, forced to clear out their offices within half an hour. This wasn’t a careful, considered reshuffling based on performance or evolving policy needs. Instead, it was a sweeping purge, reportedly driven by

“Those Who Don’t Remember the Past…”: Echoes of Stalin’s Purges in Trump’s National Security Firings

On May 23, more than 100 NSC officials were placed on administrative leave with barely any notice, forced to clear out their offices within half an hour. This wasn’t a careful, considered reshuffling based on performance or evolving policy needs. Instead, it was a sweeping purge, reportedly driven by a desire to root out perceived political opponents and consolidate control among a small group of loyalists. Many of those dismissed were detailed from other agencies and have now been sent back, leaving critical gaps in teams that manage everything from Ukraine policy to Middle East affairs.


Such actions risk undermining national security on multiple fronts. Removing seasoned professionals en masse erases decades of hard-won experience in managing complex, fast-moving global threats. These roles cannot simply be filled overnight with equally qualified replacements. The NSC’s main function is to ensure that all parts of government—military, diplomatic, and intelligence—are coordinated and working toward the same goals. Disrupting its staffing threatens to slow down and fragment the government’s response in moments of crisis.
There is also a real danger in politicizing national security. Reports suggest that loyalty, rather than expertise or job performance, was a key factor in these firings. National security should never be subjected to political litmus tests. The country’s safety depends on the best available advice, not on personal allegiance to any leader or party.


The optics of such a public, sudden purge also send troubling signals to allies and adversaries alike. At a time when global challenges are mounting, this kind of instability undermines America’s credibility and deterrence.


Every administration has the right to shape its team, but there is a responsible way to do so—one that preserves the nonpartisan expertise and institutional memory that keep the country safe. Wholesale firings driven by ideology or personal loyalty are a recipe for chaos and vulnerability. The NSC is a vital institution, and undermining it for short-term political gain is a mistake the country cannot afford.